Chinese face astrology could be accurate?

I found out that chinese face astrology might be accurate after all. Chinese face astrology is the belief that certain facial features denote a personality trait of the person. And you can tell the personality of a person a lot simply by their face.

I was listening on my way to work this audio recording of a book called "What Your Stuff Says About You?"

It is a formal investigation into snoopology and how to investigate people on a variety of factors that many criminal detectives use.

Anyway one of the topics covered was the investigation of face shape and face features and according to research done it is proving actually accurate ! If you think about it face shape is partly genetic. Some of our facial features we inherit from our parents so it would not be surprisng by getting those facial feature we are always inheriting apart of their personality. It is actually proving very accurate for something considered just a psudoscience and even more accurate then traditional astrology. They did a study with 100 participants and tried to peg their personality based on facial features using their research data. The study proved surprisingly accurate !

Opinions? Have you tried this before?

omg i think ur right my penisss does look like a 1 eyed snake rofl

leo-dragon

3 Responses to “Chinese face astrology could be accurate?”

  1. No i haven’t, first time i heard of it, haha i’m going to do some research about it!
    It sounds pretty insteresting.
    References :

  2. omg i think ur right my penisss does look like a 1 eyed snake rofl

    leo-dragon
    References :

  3. ChainLightning ⅜ on October 23rd, 2009 at 10:21 am

    Plenty of evidence for genetics, none for astrology. Like it or not we tend to look like our parents, not made up stereotypes based on a calendar.

    If you really have evidence, great. Let’s see the results. Just your say so will not do. How accurate is surprisingly? We want to see the data, the numbers. Put up the links of the testing please. I’d like to know whom and where it was done. Because to be factual, anyone at anytime can repeat the experiment. Happening just once is not good enough. Neither are anecdotes.

    Have the reaserchers been published in science journals? This would win a Nobel Prize.
    References :

Leave a Reply